May 12, 2008, 14:28, Sichuan Earthquake

By: | Comments: 35 Comments

Posted in categories: Diary

This log the event and some facts.

The fact:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2008ryan.php

Magnitude 7.8
Date-Time

* Monday, May 12, 2008 at 06:28:00 UTC
* Monday, May 12, 2008 at 02:28:00 PM at epicenter
* Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 31.099°N, 103.279°E
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region EASTERN SICHUAN, CHINA
Distances 90 km (55 miles) WNW of Chengdu, Sichuan, China
150 km (90 miles) WSW of Mianyang, Sichuan, China
360 km (225 miles) WNW of Chongqing, Chongqing, China
1545 km (960 miles) SW of BEIJING, Beijing, China
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 5.8 km (3.6 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=228, Nph=228, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.43 sec, Gp= 29°,
M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=A
Source

* USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID us2008ryan

The result:

At least 8533 killed and 10+ thousands injured, by now.

I experienced the Tangshan earthquake 32 years ago. After 32 years, still a lot of thing not changed in China. Citizen’s life is still cheap. I have nothing to say.

Stand in silent tribute.

35 Comments

  • Good day! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of people that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Thank you

  • Nevaeh says:

    Hey, that’s the grasetet! So with ll this brain power AWHFY?

  • Constance says:

    A mliloin thanks for posting this information.

  • koldra says:

    whoah this blog is excellent i love reading your posts. Keep up the great work! You realize, a lot of individuals are looking round for this info, you could aid them greatly.

  • Nice read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he just bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  • Its such as you learn my thoughts! You seem to understand a lot about this, such as you wrote the guide in it or something. I think that you could do with some % to pressure the message home a little bit, but other than that, that is magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.

  • I cherished as much as you will obtain carried out proper here. The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nevertheless, you command get got an nervousness over that you want be handing over the following. unwell indubitably come more in the past once more since precisely the same just about very steadily inside case you defend this increase.

  • I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this web site. I’m hoping the same high-grade blog post from you in the upcoming also. Actually your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my own blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings fast. Your write up is a good example of it.

  • Somebody essentially help to make seriously posts I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this particular publish amazing. Great job!

  • I’m extremely impressed along with your writing talents well with the format to your weblog. Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it your self? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s uncommon to see a nice blog like this one today..

  • I do agree with all of the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are very short for novices. Could you please extend them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  • tatuaze says:

    Hey very nice site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds also…I am happy to find so many useful info here in the post, we need develop more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  • tatuaze says:

    Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this certain information for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

  • Candy Case says:

    Hi, This is my first time dropping by this website but I had to join up and tell you how much I liked this web post. You have done a nice job of researching all aspects of the information and shown both sides equally.

  • logitech g35 says:

    You really have mentioned a number of good points in your blog entry and I just want to say thank you for how long it must took yourself to piece this together. I’ll be checking out your site again in future. Thanks a ton.

  • Tattoo Fonts says:

    I wrote a couple articles about the same subject but you seem to know a bit more about it than I do.

  • Alexxus says:

    doors.txt;10

  • Jan King says:

    Just wishin all of y’all a Happy belated V DAY 🙂

  • Adam says:

    whats up!, I am new to this site. This Websites great, I have learned loads from here so far!

  • buypills says:

    Very interesting theme

  • buypills says:

    Nice blog! Very interesting themes

  • cialis says:

    Great topic. Now i can say thank you

  • Thanks for the review! I want to say – thank you for this!

  • leizhou says:

    http://www.wenchuantour.cn/index.html

    这个网站还活着。自己去看,有多少开阔地。

    一个中学操场可以机降多少大型工程机械。不要告诉我汶县11万人口没有一个有操场的中学。驱逐舰直升机甲板多大地方?医院大楼楼顶多大地方?直升机来去自如。不要告诉我这些只有美国人能干,不但军队驾轻就熟,连警察,急救队,旅游飞机驾驶员都随便玩的能力,中国军队至今干不了。

    爱国是正确的,但是溺爱,不准批评,用幼稚可笑的借口掩盖弱点,掩盖失误,就不是爱国,而是变相的祸国殃民了。

    楼上的几位自重,不要那么自卑,畏难。

    蜀道难成为历史已经几十年了。今天用不着拿古诗来说事。

    奥运圣火可以上珠峰,手机基站可以可以上珠峰大本营。居然连空投电池动力临时基站到灾区,迅速恢复数据链都没有做到。没有做到还是没有想到?意识问题还是能力问题?

    说话要过过大脑。

  • leizhou says:

    不要跟我说中国空降兵没有这种能力。两次和俄罗斯的实兵军演,重型装备机降虽然比老大哥糙了点,但没人说是在吊钢丝演戏。如果说中国只有那参演部队几架飞机几百人能干这活,中国空降兵这老虎是不是纸得过分了一点?就算说一个军,一个空降军,都能干这活是吹牛,难道一个旅,一个团,不能12小时内在境内任意地点投放吗?难道说,是救灾任务不够调用这种精兵的级别吗?

    你不要跟我说,12小时内空降装甲运兵车或者大炮没问题,但是空降推土机,吊车就有问题。空降军是没这家伙事。可是中国各大城市有这家伙事的各种筑路建设公司海了去了。临时征用,空中吊运,没有18个小时不能进入灾区的道理。

    你不要跟我说天气恶劣。如果中国空降军组建这么多年,还是没有全天候机降能力,那打起仗来赶上下大雨我们是不是就要认输投降?

    你不要跟我说夜间。GPS,照明弹,地形雷达,单人机降组建战区区域无线定位网,这些都是公开的标准现代军事技术。如果中国军队还是样样不能,那何谈保家卫国?

    你不要跟我说保护军事机密。十几万人,几十万人,几十万父老乡亲的生命,可以为了保护并不先进的军事技术牺牲吗?反而,这种做法,给足了中国人民敌人口实,要么就是暴露了中国军队的技术低能。

    这些话尖刻了些,我也不指望商业化的铁血能给我通过楼主审核。就放在这里,给大家提个醒。

  • leizhou says:

    在被铁血的24小时陆海空三栖登陆台湾的兴奋鼓吹中潜水数年后,惊讶的发现,我们的子弟兵居然仍旧还是双脚赛过汽车轮子,在震后18个小时,终于有100健儿徒步100公里进入震中地带。

    假如这不是大自然的爆发,而是敌袭,我们的精锐如果要到D时过后14个小时才整装登机,先头部队只有一个连,这仗恐怕就不用打了。

    也难怪美国断言中国没有能力打台湾。美国的战略空军,可以在起飞24小时之内打击全球任何一个地方。如果我们打台湾也是这个速度,它自然可以好整以暇予以迎头痛击。

    也许有人说,这不能同日而语。那么请问,数十万中国公民的生命,就比三万平方公里的土地,轻贱这么多吗?

    中新网5月13日电据中国民政部网站消息,针对四川汶川县地震灾情,按照《国家自然灾害救助应急预案》,国家减灾委、民政部于5月12日15时40分紧急启动国家应急救灾二级响应,并于12日22时15分将响应等级提升为一级响应,国务院救灾工作组于当晚赶赴地震灾区,协助指导抗震救灾工作。

    没有立即启动一级响应,是准备不足还是心存侥幸?六个半小时的耽搁,温总理说早一秒就可以多救一条人命。六个小时35分钟,这23700条人命是不是去得太冤?

    美国风灾,联邦政府反应迟缓大受责备。中国在救灾之余,应反省的地方是不是也有许多?

  • leizhou says:

    天气预报之所以准,是因为数据全面。全世界各国十余颗气象卫星不间断观测,高密度地面台站联网采集数据,世界上最好的计算机实时模拟分析。

    另外,天气预报只要人口密集地区预报准确就足够了。

    但是,地震预报,并不存在如气象台般密集的岩层应力测试点,也没有遍布人迹罕至地带的自动激光位移计。而且,关键应力数据必须用深入千米地下岩层中的探测器测量。

    投资更大,技术难度更高,但是伤及人命的地震概率又特小,所以乐得忽视,赌概率。一年一点五亿的建网费,挠痒痒。

    希望这次之后,真能亡羊补牢,扎实建立地质监测网点,投资发展运算模型。为32年后打算。

  • leizhou says:

    成亦萧何,败亦萧何。

    地震预报是否可以公布,并不在于社会恐慌,而在于社会准备程度。

    如果所在地区房屋结构足够抗震,如果政府能够根据可疑地质状况组织室外活动,如果预先以演习为名部署清障救援部队,伤亡会小很多,灾区重建会容易很多。

    但是,一切的一切,32年前没有做到,今天仍旧没有做到。

    社会准备程度不足,人民的生命就轻于鸿毛吗?

Leave a Reply